Classically Trained, for the Revolution

Monday, January 25, 2010

Momentarily Net-long (but eye still on the prize)


Staring at an emptying, once-full house of glass playing cards, I've shifted to net-long, but only for a brief moment.

The reasons are two-fold: First, there is no blood (as of yet) on the Street today, following the 3-day thrashwhack last week. And second, getting a little long affords me the ability to re-hammer aggressively short from here.

The latter is especially important, since my first priority now is to participate in the downside. Corrections have a way of getting folks focused on bounces, even though the waves lower have much better energy. Getting a little long, momentarily, gives me my personal psychological edge to continue pressing sell buttons sooner rather than later; instead of looking at "safer" or more comfortable, "logical" places to enter short.

We're in a correction - I'm not in any internal debate about that. And interestingly, on the bear-only blogs today (like Friday, Thursday, etc.), I see more discussion about where we will bounce, or where one might re-short, as opposed to folks being short now.

Selling strength is my operative still (covering emotional sell-offs the other mantra). There are technical and fundamental reasons for the market to work much lower still; I'm not going to get overly clever in how we get there. Corrections have a way of punishing early, and it's still early.

-Current Longs include: SWN (from today), HUM (from today) and TIE (from Friday)
-Current Shorts include: TWM-long, JPM
-30.5% total invested

Twittspitt for details

Adding short from here, I'm expecting to key on financials still, and re-increasing TWM (the Russell2k holds quite a few smaller financial names, fyi). Beyond that, I am hunting for industry groups (other than the financials) slipping the furthest in terms of relative strength; stay tuned.

Friday, January 22, 2010

As Goes January 1984...


Posted further today at ES here.

Keeping Track (still pushing short)


Nobody needs me to come in and say something snide just now, especially me.

I'll just post the pretty pictures instead ;)

Selling strength remains my operative here; covering or hedging by adding long, on emotional weakness is the other side of that coin.

I don't like the idea of covering everything short, in anticipation or expectation of a market bounce, since I don't want to price myself out of what is the best opportunity if we only drive lower here.

The trend has changed and that is enough news for me not to question things.

As far as me being quiet lately, it's partly due to a busy week (outside of the market; traveling and otherwise), but also because sometimes it is better to flow with the flow than to stop and try to define everything. I have to be careful not to let my pen get in the way of making money.

No one really gives a shit over what I may think (about politics and new uncertainties) anyway - especially me!

That said, I will say one thing about the Monday session to come:

Monday may be a rally day for the market (as the first trading day of the week has significantly out-performed since the March lows; by a huge degree). But will things change now that the trend has shifted?

Further, if Monday strength does end this time around, it's not impossible then the change will be severe, no? I'm sure a lot of pros are counting on strength Monday - they may get very panicky if it is negative instead.


I'm long TIE only at the moment (added this morning). It's pointless to define my full position just now, since it is shifting continuously lately. I'm leaning on the Financials mostly at the moment for shorts, since that is where the blood is.

I'll keep things up on the Spitter, so as usual see the Twittspitt for details.

Be safe and good weekend.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Quicknote (and dirty)


Personally, I don't like this market - you can buy-the-dip here without me.

I did cover futures and options shorts (and my ASIA Info short) on the thrash-whack lower, but a lot of that is because I am traveling the second half of the session.

On the day, volume is running the biggest pace in 2 months and breadth is severe-negative. I'm still fully short, levered TWM and SSG, but only 14.5% invested now.

Twittspitt for details

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Quicknote (light throttle short)

I didn't say we'd go straight down ;)

I'm pressed for time and keeping this brief, but as usual posting all trades live via Twittspitt. I'll be travelling the last 3rd of tomorrow's session and aside from Twitter be out of reach most of Thursday as well.

Re the market, I'm lightly positioned but still fully short. If I get squeezed out I'll move to the side for the time being; shake things off and then re-attack

...or else reassess.

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Quicknote on Position


Briefly - the general market caught a bid again today, but leadership remains weak; especially on a relative basis.

In particular, Chinese growth names listed in the US are behaving poorly (especially notable considering today's re-weakening Dollar). I've been blowing out of these (all week...I'm down to only CISG and MR now), but I've replaced them with larger positions of more cyclical US names (SWN and NEU); for the time being.

I'm looking to keep more or less market-neutral until we improve more clearly - or I'll position more short once we begin to trend on the downside. The latter is more likely, I suspect, but I won't be short in the month of January without downtrend; regardless of my smiley-faced suspicions.

Total Position: roughly market-neutral; 48% invested; pure longs = 28%

Currently Long (according to size): SWN (reloaded today, 8.5%); NEU (reloaded today, 6.8%); CML (5.2%); CISG (4.1%); MR (3.3%)

Currently Short (all added on Tuesday): TWM-long (Russell 2k Dbl-short, 11%); INTC (5.5%); SSG-long (Semiconductor Dbl-short, 3.5%)

Futures Accounts: Short 20% Mar NDX (from 1875.125 ave); Short 10% Mar R2k (from 638.80); (covered 20% short Mar BR Pound last night, 1.6172)

See the Twittspitt for details

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Unseasonably Cold Action (+ updated position)

[Re-posted tonight from ES - scroll to bottom for updated position]

I'd like nothing more than to continue my fair-weather track of no particular agenda, favoring neither direction for the markets, and keep adding nothing brilliant to these pages.

I guess I'm about to screw myself instead.

Not that I'm cemented in any conclusions - I remain an idiot, thankfully (out of necessity if not for just being an idiot). But negatives are swirling now among us, monkey-wrenching the prospects for further rally. And further potential catalysts are due later in the week.

Yes, we did close off the lows in Tuesday's drubbing, but nothing about the action was overly positive. And for the first time in a long time, internals were resolutely one-sided + negative.

Here is a brief bullet-list of present negatives...

-Tuesday was the strongest trading volume of the year and all the indices declined (clear institutional distribution)
-The Dow was off only 0.34%, but the Nasdaq, NDX and Russell 2000 declined 1.3% each (and the SP500 0.94%). In other words, leadership was leading lower while selling in the headline-grabbing Dow was modest; making things appear less negative than reality.
-Market breadth this early into the year is rarely very negative and Tuesday showed greater than 2.5 times more declining stocks vs. positive; a seasonal anomaly and a clear negative.
-A flurry of new proposals to tax bank profits and executive bonuses creates a new (difficult to measure) negative for financial stocks in the short-term.
-Volatility rose Tuesday, closing above Friday's close and reversing Monday's accelerated downtrend (the dramatic pivot in the VIX constitutes a reversal-signal for Volatility; which implies further downside likely ahead.
-While bullish sentiment has not reached extreme highs, it remains on the high side; bearish sentiment, meanwhile, remains extremely low (negative).

Further, Intel (INTC), which reports Thursday after the close, is pricing in a 7% trading range now for following that report (up from 5.5% on Monday). In other words, the expected trading range between the high and low, following the news, is up to 7%; a big number for bellwether Intel.

Friday then has 3 potential catalyst for volatility - 1.) it's option expiration; 2.) it's the first trading day following Intel's report from late Thursday; and 3.) financial bellwether JP Morgan (JPM) reports before the open; just in case everything else is a yawn.

The NDX is now flat on the year and the Nasdaq is higher by 0.58% only. These indices are the definition of churning lately (little or no progress as volume rises). Remember, it is only a couple weeks into the trading year and seasonals are favorable. Leading indices however are distributive and churning, volatility is flashing succinct sign of life and a market's first-leg down following a major-bear's strong bounce higher is (historically) not pretty (retracement moves lower following the bounce of a major bear, which this market has yet to witness, have tended to run higher than standard 10% corrections. The data sample on this is small, as there have not been enough major bear markets, but 10% would equal the smallest first-leg down and 39% the highest).

I'm not sure that current sentiment has priced this possibility in, if you get my icy drift.

Further further, what happens when a market churns in the beginning of a new year, following a decent run-up? Again, there are not so many examples, but they tend to lead to corrections, or sometimes worse.

Take the daily-view (below) of the Dow from March, 1983 to September, 1984 and pay special attention to the churn at the beginning of 1984 (it behaved enough like the Nasdaq has so far this year to at least be wary; both examples are clear cases of churning...running up strong out of the gate and then going nowhere for several sessions, before turning down).

All of this is not to say the toast cannot fall butter-side up for this market (it's a brave new world after all!) and subsequently I'm not ringing alarm bells, calling for dramatic downside. For that reason I won't refer back to this post if the market gets ripped in the coming weeks.

...though I would like to give myself a genuine hard time however, should we rally straight-up from here instead ;)

*Click and expand to view clearly; thanks to ultra for drawing this one up.

Total Position: ~1.1-to-1 net-short, 46% invested
(I reloaded some longs and initiated shorts today; market-neutral bent so far).

Currently Long (according to size): CML (5.2%); CISG (4.2%); WATG (3.7%); HEAT (reloaded today, 3.4%); MR (added today, 3.4%); VIT (reloaded today, 3.3%); CAAS (reloaded today, 3.3%)

Currently Short (all added on Tuesday): TWM-long (Russell 2k Dbl-short, 11%); INTC (5.5%); SSG-long (Semiconductor Dbl-short, 3.5%)

Futures Accounts: 20% short Mar BR Pound (from 1.6163); 10% short Mar R2k (from 638.80)

See the Twittspitt for details