Classically Trained, for the Revolution

Monday, October 18, 2010

Dis(cussing) RINO International

"...On the other hand, after an extensive advance which finally spreads to issues neglected all throughout the bull market, belated individual strength and activity not only are likely to be short-lived but may actually suggest the end of the general recovery, especially if the early leaders begin to show no further response."

The Battle for Investment Survival; G.M. Loeb, 1935

We're seeing plenty of laggards come to life lately and plenty of bullish chatter on such issues; based largely on technical positives, such as stocks breaking above moving averages, upside break-outs of lengthy (though low-level in these cases) consolidations and/or price-breaks above obvious resistance points.

Coincident to the late-to-the-party cheerful rush, is a rather uncomfortable numbers of previous leaders stalling or turning lower (Cloud-based technology leaders, Semiconductors, etc.). Not every leader has stopped rising, but enough of the early leadership has stalled now to raise concerns (especially in terms of relative-strength), while general sentiment of investors have seen an increase of optimism.

And while some of these laggards coming to life will represent good, quick trades long, the risk vs. reward here resembles the classic image of picking up rolls of nickels in front of steam rollers. They may work more often than not (shorter-term), but the fundamental reason for longer-term under-performance could surface at any time (flattening traders grotesquely). I am personally looking at which to short instead.

RINO International, a Chinese company listed only in the US (i.e., it does not trade in its home country China, like so many Chinese names on Nasdaq), is a former leader and broke above its 200-day MA today after breaking through earlier resistance last week. There are a lot of traders getting involved, as RINO's near-term technicals suggest higher prices ahead.

While I won't recommend getting short RINO, I will go out of the way to recommend staying away from the long-side. I am short RINO, as of this afternoon, but not very much and not in all accounts. This is a difficult stock to borrow; I've taken what I can for now in case nothing further shows up. I'd rather wait for the first sign of failure, but will take it day to day and see what is available and how the name continues to perform.

RINO was a staunch leader as a younger IPO last year and I was trading (the beast!) aggressively (long) along the way. Like a lot of IPOs, I've learned to walk away once the first top is confirmed, since so many never really come back (love 'em and leave 'em!) [EDIT: I should stop calling this an IPO from last year - it existed earlier, but as a penny stock with minute trading volume]. This was basically the pattern RINO demonstrated, as the stock traded essentially lower-only for six ugly months (from 35 to 11). RINO then consolidated consolidated sideways and is arriving late now to this year's equity party. FWIW, the stock still needs to rise another 95% to reach the high posted last December.

RINO has an incredible short interest. Over 50% of RINO float is short (>16.5% total shares outstanding). This may seem a positive to some of the enthusiastic traders on RINO today, since a high short interest could create a squeeze. But when shorts get this aggressive they do tend to be right (they are more sophisticated traders, for one thing and large shorts do large amounts of homework on the fundamentals. Names with heavy short interest tend to prove shorts correct in the end; it is a matter of when and it is not prudent to take them on with the other side). While 16.5% (outstanding) is not incredibly high, the >50% float is truly exceptional.

Of further concern is the recent pattern (beginning late summer) of Chinese companies listed only in the US blowing up with accounting scandals, fired auditors, resigning CFOs, etc. We have gone a few years without seeing much of this and then we saw a half-dozen of them in just a couple of weeks. Would you be surprised to learn that the accounting standards on these names is commonly slack?

Finally, click on the chart below and focus on the relative strength (RS) line, now at 26. Even though RINO has had a break-out and a nice run, the RS is still below the previous 17.06 high (in other words, RS is negatively diverging). I love buying breakouts when RS precedes price and I prefer avoiding or else shorting a breakout when there is a defined negative divergence in RS instead.

RINO may go higher and this post is not to say it cannot. But the name is a former leader and current question mark now at best.


Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Updated Position (fire marshall head count needed)


It's a bull market in genius right now.

Bulls are in complete control, a "perfect-storm" script of a friendly Fed pushing inflation at their sprinting backs, giving gumption a new name.

Bears meanwhile, are essentially paper pulp.

I'm not far from neutral at the moment and I'm not especially active; not wanting to chase madness and not willing to get long laggards coming late to the party. I've pared-back or at least reduced most of my extended longs and I've been lucky-good with my short side of things lately; not getting killed on that end, FWIW.

AAPL is over $300 today and every trader should have one eye on this name now; today's closing price is important. If Apple can digest itself at 300 and carry on, there is no reason to complain (yet) the bull market party has become too crowded. If AAPL struggles with 300 however, I'm looking to exit (neutralize or shift net-short) - and get home in time to catch SNL.

In the meantime, being old and gumption-challenged as I've become, I'll just keep close to the exit and watch everyone else have all this fun.

Miners - 17 cheers and counting!
...enjoy the light

Follow Centrifugal to fade trades in real time

Total Position: Currently 1.10-to-1 net-long, 74% invested

Currently Long (according to size):
ULTA (re-increased yesterday, 7.3%); BMC (added yesterday, 6.1%); VPHM (5.3%); CXO (5.2%); LULU (5%); LTD (reduced yesterday, 5%); NANO (re-loaded yesterday, 4.8%); EWS-Singapore (sold today)

Currently Short: CVS (8%); DISH (7.3%); CRUS (7.1%); GMCR (re-loaded yesterday, 7%); ZMH (5.8%)

Futures: no current position

Friday, October 08, 2010

Updated Position (bellwether to ring)

The Dow made 11,000 today, commodities surged higher, volatility laid to 5-month lows and AAPL moved to within spitting distance of $300 (2% to go now; 294/shr).

Apple at 300 will be far more interesting than this thousandth visit of Dow 11k. Watch the market action the day AAPL tests the mark. I suspect it will mark an important inflection (whether the response is positive or negative).

I've traded a lot this last week. Traded myself out of a hole for one thing. And the sight of so many dead bodies from Wednesday's momentum rout has not left my thoughts (I'm very impressionable that way). Still, I won't fight a stampede if the market can steam-spray momo blood out of the way and carry on with the parade.

Let's see how the market digests a $300 apple. I'll look to increase net-long exposure again after AAPL survives the milestone. In the meantime, I'm closer to neutral, driving with both feet.

Follow Centrifugal to fade trades in real time

Total Position: Currently 1.51-to-1 net-long, 71% invested

Currently Long (according to size): LTD (8.2%);
CRM (7.5%); EWS-Singapore (5.8%); CTXS (reloaded today, 5.6%); VPHM (5.3%); CXO (5.2%); ULTA (5.1%)

Currently Short: CVS (added today, 7.9%); DISH (7.3%); CRUS (re-loaded today, 7%); ZMH (added today, 6%); GMCR (covered today for now)

Futures: no current position

Wednesday, October 06, 2010

Updated Position (no more money for nothing and chicks for free)

The good news: Extended leadership sliced lower in droves today, creating opportunity to enter the strongest names on an emotional slice down. That is the brief means with which quality momentum let's you in.

The Bad News: These names did not recover later in the day and bless their daily charts with long, bullish tails in their wake. Instead they only worsened, for the more part, finishing the day down significantly, and closing near their lows (CRM did manage a bit of a tail, but closed down 8%; not exactly a jump-up-and-down positive session).

In other words - they let you in all day long. Never mind the fact that there wasn't really a catalyst either. If you want to believe a butterfly can cause a tsunami, then sure - today's drubbing in leadership stocks was due to a negative pre-announcement from cloud stalwart EQIX.

The Ugly: The DJIA finished up 23 points, CNBC heads and Johnny Come Punchbowl Lately are giddy with the rush higher in laggard stocks and do not currently gauge the market as acting badly. They've stop focusing on the dull US economy for a minute and they're getting ready for Dow 11k. You know, you know - the Fed will do whatever they can now to get asset prices higher! Don't fight the Fed, right? After more than a decade the market just might be good again. Where did I put my money-market checkbook, anyway?

In and of itself, the late-comer enthusiasm is not such a negative. I don't mind if people are happy. But let's be real - leadership has behaved badly for two weeks now (especially on a relative basis). Today's full-on press lower might end up something of a crescendo short term (or not!), but the complexion of the market has worsened now. This follows a new raft of exuberance (not to mention the recent self-proclaimed triumph of genius emanated from a new skin of Twitter day-traders) and a new (new?) consensus the Fed is serious about taking the market higher. At the same time, real, new-money fuel is suddenly overwhelmed by leadership selling (the opposite of buying), coincident with retail investors rushing in to pick up lower quality, bargain stocks.

Don't get me wrong, this may not sink the bigger picture. This may be nothing more than a dramatic rotational slap and we'll stabilize, consolidate and ultimately lust higher yet again. Frankly, it doesn't matter to me. I'm paid not to care and I trade better that way. I've got a couple hundred sources telling me what's going to happen but still I prefer what is happening, over such reason. I have said I would push till it pops and for better or for worse - today something popped.

Again again again I doubt this is the beginning of me getting bearish, but it is the moment where I become defensive (over-weight discipline; stay home late at night; text only emergencies while driving, leave the week-old chicken in the refrigerator for someone else, etc.).

It is never a positive (in my headpan at least) when the back of the roller-coaster is rising still, and voices shrill while excited eyes point to high-blue skies, but meanwhile, the front of the cart on the other end is already accelerating downward.

I'll take a step back, for the moment at least. Let others make the money.

Follow Centrifugal to fade trades in real time

Total Position: Currently 1.56-to-1 net-long, 60% invested

Currently Long (according to size):
CRM (9.3%); VPHM (7.8%); EWS-Singapore (5.8%); CXO (5.2%); ULTA (reduced today, 5%); MCP (3.9%).
Sold long today: 8% ORCL; 7% NTGR; 6% NANO; 5.3% CTRX; 4% TRW

Currently Short: DISH (increased today, 7.2%); GMCR (5.9%); DELL (5.9%); MU (added today, 4.6%).
Covered short today: 7% CRUS; 5.7% FSLR (5.7%)

Futures: no current position

Tuesday, October 05, 2010

Updated Position (check the turn)

Not a bad session really. Certainly not with that higher-low face-slap pivot to fresh highs.

And all that they bring.

But as much as I liked a session like today (I know you're seething), I didn't enjoy all that enthusiasm (in certain places; Tuesday). I especially didn't like the higher-high squelching coming from my super secret media source_x.

This guy gets this excited only when the next session is either dull or otherwise reverses; not kidding.

Add to that, the NDX and IBD 100 (two leadership indices) did not confirm higher-highs today. I'm not going any further than mention that point just now; not unless/until it becomes an ongoing issue. It's the squealing that has my guard up.

I backed-off a bit, into the close. I may neutralize further Wednesday, depending.

Yes, yes - push it till it pops. Fine. Hold this bag for me though. Just for a moment, please.

Follow Centrifugal to fade trades in real time

Total Position: Currently 2.35-to-1 net-long, 100% invested

Currently Long (according to size):
CRM (10.1%); ORCL (increased today, 8%); VPHM (7.6%); ULTA (7.2%); NTGR (7%); NANO (increased today, 6%); EWS-Singapore (5.8%); CTRX (added yesterday, 5.3%); CXO (5.2%); MCP (reduced today, 4%); TRW (4%)

Currently Short: CRUS (added end of day, 7%); DELL (added end of day, 6%); GMCR (6%); FSLR (5.7%); DISH (5%)

Futures: no current position

Monday, October 04, 2010

Updated Position (pushing till it pops)


Leadership has been lagging for several days now, but I took today's weakness to lighten on shorts and add a bit long. I'm keeping faith in the larger, positive look to things. Or, as long as my pact with the bears prevails (as long as I'm getting away with it).

I'll adjust later in the session if things only worsen.

Total Position: Currently 3.04-to-1 net-long, 91% invested

Currently Long (according to size):
CRM (9.8%); VPHM (7.5%); MCP (7.3%); ULTA (7.2%); NTGR (6.6%); ORCL (6.5%); EWS-Singapore (5.7%); CXO (5%); NFLX (re-loaded today, 5%); NANO (3.9%); TRW (3.9%)

Currently Short: GMCR (5.8%); MRVL (5.8%); FSLR (5.7%); DISH (5%)
-Covered largest shorts AAPL and TSRA, this hour, today.

Follow Centrifugal to fade trades in real time

Futures: no current position

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Updated Position (long and wrong suits me still)

While this post updates my current position, I've been firing in and out and increasing/decreasing numerous names lately. The below list will not likely remain current for any length of minutes.

Follow Centrifugal to fade trades in real time - now more than ever!

A note to email subscribers - I have no idea how or why the June 4th Butterfly Punch post was just delivered. I have fat fingers, certainly, but I wasn't anywhere near a page that could have caused this. Apologies.

Back to NFLX, I have not attacked short since my weekend post, but I did manage to bag a minor flash-crash of success hedging with AAPL instead (from into yesterday's close to a minute into today's open). I'm not particularly bearish on AAPL (not yet!), but it is such a strong name that to trade it short (at this point in time), you really have to cover on a slice lower. Until something more fundamental begins to disturb the stock, slice-lows will be nothing more than the latest buy-opp. This was the point I'm making in NFLX (if you trade it short, cover on any significant slice), but with Netflix I am looking to get myself long again on such a slice; not the case for me with AAPL (I'll let the entire investing universe make the further money on that one. And I'm keen to get short with a core holding there once I can justify it technically; call me a fool).

And a quick note to traders ripping gains lately by jamming the leadership names long. Yes yes, you are genius, but don't stop to remind yourself of that. Those very super intelligent trades you've been scoring move through you, not from you. I say this because self adulation in this game leads to a whack on the skull. Kisses.

Rock on - 7PM!

Total Position: Currently 3.43-to-1 net-long, 95% invested

Currently Long (according to size):
ULTA (7.3%); WLL (7.2%); VPHM (7.1%); CRM (7.1%); TRW (7.1%); NTGR (6.8%); BVN (6.7%); ORCL (6.6%); EWS-Singapore (5.6%); RJI (4.3%) MCP (trading frequently, now light w/ 4.1%); RLD (added yesterday, thin and will not hold w close below 17.60, 4.1%); QLIK (thin, added today, 3.6%)

Currently Short: QID-long (Nasdaq 100 2x's-short, added today, 6.9%); HK (6.1%); DISH (5%)
Note: Inverse ETF (QID) currently weighted @1.65 x's towards long/short calculation

Futures: no current position